
Digital forensics and expert testimony across investigations and complex disputes, domestic and international.
James is a court-recognized expert who has given testimony in over 100 cases involving topics such as evidence preservation, and digital forensic methodologies and procedures. In addition to being an EnCase Certified Examiner (EnCE), James is certified as a GIAC Certified Forensic Examiner (GCFE).
James has trained hundreds of law enforcement officers, attorneys, and other examiners on computer forensics and high-technology related issues involving best practices and methodologies. He has 16 years law enforcement experience, has co-developed computer forensic courses for the California Department of Justice, and has been involved in high profile cases throughout his career.
James has extensive experience working on litigation and consulting matters in digital forensics, eDiscovery, and other high technology issues. His experience covers both the Windows and MAC OS platforms. He serves his clients through the litigation or consulting lifecycle by assisting them with important issues like data scoping, preserving, gathering, processing, hosting, review and production, as well as diving into deeper issues uncovered through the use of digital forensics.
James’ matters have varied widely and span across diverse areas such as misappropriation of trade secrets, intellectual property issues, contract disputes, fraud investigations, alleged hacking, and employment disputes, among others. He has served clients on the plaintiff side, the defendant side, and has served as a third party neutral on several occasions.
The earlier you understand the evidence, the better the decisions that follow.
The evidence is abundant. But volume is not access. Access is not understanding. And understanding is not an expert opinion.
Increasingly, evidence is buried across devices, applications, databases, cloud systems, transactions, and other complex sources. It must be found, preserved, made accessible, understood, and interpreted in the context of the matter. And when expert testimony is required, that understanding must support an independent, defensible opinion.
When important evidence surfaces late, assumptions may already have become strategy. When it is identified, tested, and understood early, your team can build its strategy around what can actually be shown. This isn’t just for trial. It is also for TROs, letters rogatory, discovery requests, subpoenas, depositions, summary judgment, mediation, and arbitration.
You bring the legal expertise. We bring the evidence expertise.
iDS combines technical, analytical, and subject-matter expertise to help you move from evidence to understanding, and, when necessary, from understanding to opinion and testimony.
You know the law. We help you know the evidence.
Tell us what you need to establish. We will tell you what the evidence shows, what it does not, and what it means for your case.
Contact iDSRead how we approached matters that started as unanswerable questions. No client details, no case statistics.
See the Can You…? questions →Copyright © 2026 iDiscovery Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Cookie settings