Our client was the defendant in an ITC Theft of Trade Secrets matter. The plaintiff alleged that they had taken critical documents from a secure and protected environment. Among other things, our client did not believe that the information qualified as a trade secret.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
iDS was tasked with:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n iDS was selected for this engagement because we have deep experience in both critical dimensions \u2013 ISP program design and implementation as well as expert witness testimony specifically related to cybersecurity. <\/p>\n\n\n\n A project plan was drawn up which included:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the plaintiff\u2019s cybersecurity experts was withdrawn prior to trial. Although the matter was adjudicated against our client based on spoliation, even the remaining opposing expert conceded that the plaintiff had failed to reasonably protect much of what had been claimed as a trade secret.<\/p>\n\n\n Challenge Assist a client with evaluating and information security program and whether a firm was entitled to trade secret protection based on reasonable security measures. Our client was the defendant in an ITC Theft of Trade Secrets matter. The plaintiff alleged that they had taken critical documents from a secure and protected environment. Among other […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":152,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","case_study":[],"class_list":["post-151","case-study","type-case-study","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","has-post-title","has-post-date","has-post-category","has-post-tag","has-post-comment","has-post-author",""],"yoast_head":"\nSolution<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Using a team of experts evaluate the security measures in place versus industry standards. Compose an expert report describing our conclusions. <\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Result<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
iDS\u2019 conclusions in both the report and deposition resulted in plaintiffs dropping one expert for trial and the other conceded real issues with the security measures
in place. <\/h3>\n\n\n\n